Page:Obergefell v. Hodges.pdf/78

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Cite as: 576 U. S. ___ (2015)
1

Thomas, J., dissenting

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


Nos. 14–556, 14–562, 14–571 and 14–574


JAMES OBERGEFELL, ET AL., PETITIONERS

14–556
v.

RICHARD HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL.;

VALERIA TANCO, ET AL., PETITIONERS

14–562
v.

BILL HASLAM, GOVERNOR OF TENNESSEE, ET AL.;

APRIL DEBOER, ET AL., PETITIONERS

14–571
v.

RICK SNYDER, GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.; AND

GREGORY BOURKE, ET AL., PETITIONERS

14–574
v.

STEVE BESHEAR, GOVERNOR OF KENTUCKY

ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

[June 26, 2015]

Justic Thomas, with whom Justice Scalia joins, dissenting.

The Court’s decision today is at odds not only with the Constitution, but with the principles upon which our Nation was built. Since well before 1787, liberty has been understood as freedom from government action, not entitlement to government benefits. The Framers created our