3
their chief reliance on the appropriate and particular argument relating to the nature of corn.
On the other hand, those who have taken the opposite side of the question, if they have imagined, that they had combated this particular argument with success, have been too apt to consider the point as determined, without much reference to the more weighty and important arguments, which remained behind.
Among the latter description of persons I must rank myself. I have always thought, and still think, that this peculiar argument of Dr. Smith, is fundamentally erroneous, and that it cannot be maintained without violating the great principles of supply and demand, and contradicting the general spirit and scope of the reasonings, which pervade the "Wealth of Nations".
But I am most ready to confess, that, on a former occasion, when I considered the Corn Laws, my attention was too much engrossed by this one peculiar view of the subject, to give the other arguments, which belong to it, their due weight.
I am anxious to correct an error, of which I feel conscious. It is not however my intention, on the present occasion, to express an opinion on the general question. I shall only endeavour to state, with the strictest impartiality, what appear to me to be the advantages and disadvan-
