Page:On the Pollution of the Rivers of the Kingdom.djvu/29

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.

23

100 of standard colour was totally destroyed, a second 100 was similarly bleached, and of a third 100 only 20 remained."

On the 9th of April 16 samples of air were examined.Page 26.

"Three samples taken in Edinburgh in places away from the Water of Leith, and one sample collected in Leith at a distance from the polluted stream, gave respectively the degrees of purity 80, 75, 80, and 80, and one sample taken from the harbour at the Victoria Dockhead gave 70, while the air collected under the immediate influence of the Water of Leith conveying the sewage of Edinburgh and Leith gave respectively 60, 60, 50, 60, 60, 55, 55, 55, 60, 50, and 55.

"On the 14th April six samples of air were collected and examined, when it was found that over the Water of Leith before mixture with sewage the degree of purity was 80, while over the sewers and the Water of Leith conveying sewage the degrees of purity were 68, 66, 70, 64, and 70.

Page 27"In the whole course of the Water of Leith, from Coltbridge downwards, not a single fish could be seen."

The Water of Leith at Edinburgh.

Page 30."The condition of the Thames at London is much less foul than the water of Leith as it traverses Edinburgh.

Page 33"It will thus be observed that the Water of Leith as it leaves Edinburgh contains fully ten times the quantity of organic matter which is found in the Thames at London Bridge, and necessarily the offensiveness of the water must be correspondingly greater."

30th March 1865.
Inspectors of Salmon Fisheries Fourth Report.
Extract from Mr. FFfennell's 4th Report, 1865, as regards the pollution of Streams.

Page 14 of Report.—"Public attention is now so earnestly directed to this question, and public opinion so strong in regard to the necessity of mitigating the evil complained of, that it may not be in vain to hope that some comprehensive measure may ere long be taken to abate a nuisance so excessive in its baneful effects, in many ways as to alarm the minds of reflecting persons who are thoughtful and watchful of the sanitary condition of the people, and to create apprehension that it is insidiously in a less apparent manner generating