Page:On the Sublime 1890.djvu/99

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
XXXII
Longinus on the Sublime
63

XXXIII

But supposing now that we assume the existence of a really unblemished and irreproachable writer. Is it not worth while to raise the whole question whether in poetry and prose we should prefer sublimity accompanied by some faults, or a style which never rising above moderate excellence never stumbles and never requires correction? and again, whether the first place in literature is justly to be assigned to the more numerous, or the loftier excellences? For these are questions proper to an inquiry on the Sublime, and urgently asking for settlement.

2I know, then, that the largest intellects are far from, being the most exact. A mind always intent on correctness is apt to be dissipated in trifles; but in great affluence of thought, as in vast material wealth, there must needs be an occasional neglect of detail. And is it not inevitably so? Is it not by risking nothing, by never aiming high, that a writer of low or middling powers keeps generally clear of faults and secure of blame? whereas the loftier

walks of literature are by their very loftiness perilous?3 I am well aware, again, that there is a law by which in all human productions the weak points catch the eye first, by which their faults