MISCELLANEOUS OBSERVATIONS- I. Emendations of Athenceus. Athen. ti. p. 44 F. Ed. Dind. Evcpopicov ^e 6 XaXKi- d€V9 ovTco TTOV ypaCpec' AaavpTa^ AaaivovLo^ ovce TrpoaeceiTo TTOTOv KaOcLTrep el aWoi^ ovpov oe TrpoteTo KaOairep Traures avdpcoiroi. KaJ ttoWoI clol (piXoTijUiiav eTre^eiprjaav irapa- TJjpfjaaL Kai aTreaTtjcrav irpo tov evpeiv to irpaTTOjUievov, Oepov^ ycip (hpa Kal TpiaKOvOrjjuepov TrpodecpevovTG^^ kui ovcepo^ IUL6P opiJovTe^ aireyojULGVOV aXjavpoVy Tf/v kvgtlv o avTov eyovTa^ avveTreicrOrjaav aXtjdeveLP. It is clear that the words Trjv kvcttiv S' avTov eyovra are corrupt, and Meineke (Euphor. Trag. p. 167.) observes, that no critic has been hitherto able to restore the passage. I imagine, however, that a slight attention would effect this. I would read tyjv KvaTiv avTov ev eyovTa, and then the sense would be perfectly plain. Athen. iii. p. Ill B. ^epeKparrj^ ETriXfjajuovi 'QXev o^cXiav GTrociv. apTou ce ^rj Trpori/uiai^ Dobree reads aTro^eiv^ (Adv. t. 11. p. 302.) which is doubtless right; but wXep is also corrupt, and I would propose sub- stituting X (hXov^ i. e. Kal bXov. Athen. v. p. 204 E. To oe o')(r}ix avTrjs ovre tol^ fxaKpal^ vavcTLV ovT€ Tat9 aTpoyyvXuL^ eoiKO^^ aWa TraprjXXayiuei/oi^ T€ Kal TT/oo? Ti^v ypGiav TOV TTOTajuiov TO j3a6o^. Dindorf observes, " Nisi plura ex hoc loco exciderunt scribendum saltern, tovt€ TroTajmov to (idOo^'" I conceive that nothing is wanting, but we must read TraprjXXay^evov ti. Athen. ix. p. 393 C. "iTTTrapxo^ ^v ttj AlyvirTia 'iXtdSi Ov fioi AlyviTTLWV (iio^ ^pecxev olov exovai^ Xevvia TiXXovTc^ KaXKUTidSei craXeovTa.
