Page:Philosophical Review Volume 1.djvu/579

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
No. 5.]
REVIEWS OF BOOKS.
563

to be accurate in all cases where they have been compared with the originals.

Of course there is room for much difference of opinion as to what should be included in a volume like this, but on the whole the selections seem to have been made with excellent judgment. Not only are entire paragraphs given, as a rule, but the portions of the different works from which selections have been made are ordinarily quite well represented. The selections are from the following works: Discours de la Méthode, Regulæ ad Directionem Ingenii, Meditationes de Prima Philosophia, Principia Philosophiæ, Le Monde, De l’Homme, and Traité des Passions de l’Ame. The selections from the Discours are from the first three parts only, the last three being omitted because they discuss matters treated in other writings. It certainly was a good idea to include a translation of the essential portions of the Regulæ. As will be remembered, Kuno Fischer says, "What the Discours compresses into four short rules, and only stipples, as it were, The Rules for the Direction of the Mind develop in detail, though not completely." The Meditationes seem to have been reduced only about twenty-five per cent, while the Principia is very inadequately represented by an extract of fourteen pages. Sixty-five pages are given to Le Monde — a liberal allowance; but here one misses the numerous explanatory diagrams, which, of course, it was impracticable to reproduce in a book of this kind. The extract from De l’Homme and that from a letter to Mersenne on the automatism of brutes together occupy only twelve pages, most of the remainder of the volume being devoted to the Traité. The last fifteen pages are taken up with extracts from letters by Descartes on the happy life and the highest good.

If one were to criticise the principle upon which the selections have been made, he would probably suggest that it would have been better to cover rather less ground somewhat more thoroughly. For instance, such fragments as are given from the Principia and De l’Homme are altogether inadequate, while one occasionally misses important passages in the selections from the Traité. As a volume of selections, however, the present one is in the main satisfactory. But the question arises, Why make a volume of selections from the works of Descartes at all? None of his most important works are very long. Professor Veitch has already given us a good translation of the Discours and the Meditationes entire, and of most of the Principia. Of this the teacher of philosophy can have his class use as much or as little as he pleases. Would not the translator of the present volume have done more to merit the gratitude of his fellow-teachers by giving them for class use an equally good complete translation of the Regulæ and the Traité, and also of Le Monde and De l’Homme, if space permitted and the omission of the diagrams (which