Page:Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A - Volume 184.djvu/844

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
748
DR. OLIVER LODGE ON ABERRATION PROBLEMS.

Definition of Ray.

23. In § 13 we defined a ray as the path of a labelled disturbance,[1] for it is that which enables an eye to fix direction, it is that which determines the line of collimation of a telescope. Now in order that a disturbance from may reach , it is necessary that adjacent elements of a wave front at shall arrive at in the same phase; hence the path by which a disturbance travels must satisfy this condition from point to point, viz., that disturbances arriving at any point from a preceding point of a ray agree in phase. This condition will be satisfied if the time of journey down a ray and down all infinitesimally differing paths is the same.

The equation to a ray is therefore contained in the statement that the time taken by light to traverse it is a minimum; or

minimum.

If the medium, instead of being stationary, is drifting with the velocity , at angle to the ray, we must substitute for the modified velocity , and so the function that has to be a minimum in order to give the path of a ray in a moving medium is

minimum.

Path of Ray, and Time of Journey, through an Irrotationally Moving Medium.

24. Writing a velocity-potential in the above equation to a ray, that is putting

,

and ignoring possible variations in the minute correction factor , between the points and , it becomes

Time of journey minimum.

Now the second term depends only on end points, and therefore has no effect on path. The first term contains only the second power of aberration magnitude; and hence it has much the same value as if everything were stationary. A ray that was

  1. [It has been objected that a bit of wave-front cannot be labelled, because of diffraction effects. This seems to me only a practical difficulty, and a more practical definition based upon preserved phase-con nexion follows a few lines later in the text; but the meaning conveyed by the convenient phrase “labelled disturbance” can equally well and I think unobjectionably be expressed by calling a ray the path of a definite, or identical, portion of energy—the direction of energy-flux.—July, 1893.]