institute proceedings in a court or tribunal for judicial review of the failure to take the decision on the ground that there has been unreasonable delay in taking the decision; or
(b)
(i)
an administrator has a duty to take a decision;
(ii)
a law prescribes a period within which the administrator is required to take that decision; and
(iii)
the administrator has failed to take that decision before the expiration of that period,
institute proceedings in a court or tribunal for judicial review of the failure to take the decision within that period on the ground that the administrator has a duty to take the decision notwithstanding the expiration of that period.
Procedure for judicial review
7. (1) Any proceedings for judicial review in terms of section 6(1) must be instituted without unreasonable delay and not later than 180 days after the date—
(a)
subject to subsection (2)(c), on which any proceedings instituted in terms of internal remedies as contemplated in subsection (2)(a) have been concluded; or
(b)
where no such remedies exist, on which the person concerned was informed of the administrative action, became aware of the action and the reasons for it or might reasonably have been expected to have become aware of the action and the reasons.
(2) (a) Subject to paragraph (c), no court or tribunal shall review an administrative action in terms of this Act unless any internal remedy provided for in any other law has first been exhausted.
(b) Subject to paragraph (c), a court or tribunal must, if it is not satisfied that any internal remedy referred to in paragraph (a) has been exhausted, direct that the person concerned must first exhaust such remedy before instituting proceedings in a court or tribunal for judicial review in terms of this Act.
(c) A court or tribunal may, in exceptional circumstances and on application by the person concerned, exempt such person from the obligation to exhaust any internal remedy if the court or tribunal deems it in the interest of justice.
(3) The Rules Board for Courts of Law established by section 2 of the Rules Board for Courts of Law Act, 1985 (Act No. 107 of 1985), must within one year after the date of commencement of this Act, make and implement rules of procedure for judicial review.
(4) Before the implementation of the rules of procedure referred to in subsection (3), all proceedings for judicial review must be instituted in a High Court or the Constitutional Court.
(5) Any rule made under subsection (3) must, before publication in the Gazette, be approved by Parliament.
Remedies in proceedings for judicial review
8. (1) The court or tribunal, in proceedings for judicial review in terms of section 6(1), may grant any order that is just and equitable, including orders—
(a)
directing the administrator—
(i)
to give reasons; or
(ii)
to act in the manner the court of tribunal requires;
(b)
prohibiting the administrator from acting in a particular manner;
(c)
setting aside the administrative action and—
(i)
remitting the matter for reconsideration by the administrator, with or without directions; or
(ii)
in exceptional cases—
(aa)
substituting or varying the administrative action or correcting a defect resulting from the administrative action; or
(bb)
directing the administrator or any other party to the proceedings to pay compensation;
(d)
declaring the rights of the parties in respect of any matter to which the administrative action relates;
(e)
granting a temporary interdict or other temporary relief; or
