Page:Punch and judy.djvu/60

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
50
MORAL OF PUNCH'S PERFORMANCES.
[PUNCH.

filled by the various characters of Pulcinella, Harlequin, Scaramouch, the Doctor, and others, were exhibited only before the rabble of the community: the contrary might be satisfactorily established. The most dignified and the gravest not infrequently laid aside their dignity and their gravity; and, like Leo X., rejoiced in the broadest representations of the buffoons.[1] Dr. Moore, who wrote his "View of Society in Italy," 8vo., 1781, confesses that he and the Duke of Hamilton, going to the performance with all possible prejudices against it, were delighted: he especially dwells upon a most ludicrous scene, in which Harlequin made a stammerer bring out a word which had been sticking in his throat for a quarter of an hour, by striking him on the back, as nurses strike a choking infant.[2] We have since seen a refined French auditory laugh heartily at the very same incident, the only difference being, that Potier was not dressed as Harlequin, nor Brunet as Pulcinella.

At various periods, the adventures of Punch have been differently represented and misrepresented, and innovations have been introduced, to suit the taste and to meet the events of the day. One attempt of this sort was made in Fielding's time, in consequence of the extreme popularity of "the Provoked Husband." He complains ("Tom Jones," Book 12, chap. 5,) that a puppet-show, witnessed by his hero, included "the fine and serious part" of the comedy we have named. He then proceeds, from the mouth of Jones, to shew its inferiority to the old exhibition of Punch and his wife, (whom he miscalls Joan, by some strange forgetfulness,
  1. "To such an extreme was this propensity carried, that his courtiers and attendants could not more effectually obtain his favour than by introducing to him such persons as, by their eccentricity, perversity, or imbecility of mind, were likely to excite his mirth." Roscoe's Leo X. 4, 370, Edition 1827. This author is at a difficulty to account for this "propensity," which is easily explained on the principle of contrast. It is fortunate for his gravity that Punch and Judy were not invented in the time of Leo, "for the Pope would certainly have kept a puppet-show for his own private amusement.
  2. Vol. I. p. 258.