Page:R v Tarrant 2020 NZHC 2192 sentencing remarks.pdf/25

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

person motivated by a base hatred for people who you perceive to be different from yourself.

Sentencing purposes

[124]Mr Tarrant, in sentencing you my prime objectives are threefold. First and foremost, to condemn your crimes and to denounce your actions. Second, to hold you accountable for the terrible harm you have caused — in plain terms, to attempt to impose some commensurate punishment. I do that on behalf of the whole community, which in particular includes the victims of your crimes and their families, all of whom are a part of New Zealand’s multicultural society. Third, there is the need to protect the community from a person capable of committing cold-blooded murder on such a scale and who presents such a grave risk to public safety.

[125]A predominant feature of your offending is that your homicidal actions constituted an act of terrorism and that your victims were targeted predominantly because of their religion but also their ethnicity, their race and their colour. I am required to impose a sentence that appropriately takes into account and reflects those particular aggravating features of your crimes and the distorted motivations that lay behind them.[1]

The starting points

[126]On the 51 charges of murder the sentences can only be ones of life imprisonment.[2]

[127]Attempted murder carries a maximum sentence of 14 years’ imprisonment.[3] You have been convicted of attempting to murder 40 people. It is plain you tried to kill many more on 15 March. After your arrest you told police that you regretted not doing so. Of the 40 survivors who were shot by you and in respect of whom you were charged with attempting to murder, almost all suffered very serious life-threatening

  1. Sentencing Act 2002, s 9(1)(h) and (ha).
  2. Crimes Act 1961, s 172; and Sentencing Act, s 102(1).
  3. Crimes Act, s 173(1).