Page:Radio-activity.djvu/236

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

coloration and clearly revealed the heterogeneity of structures of the crystal.

The cause of these colorations by cathode and radium rays has been the subject of much discussion. Elster and Geitel[1] observed that a specimen of potassium sulphate, coloured green by radium rays, showed a strong photo-electric action, i.e. it rapidly lost a negative charge of electricity when exposed to the action of ultra-violet light. All substances coloured by cathode rays show a strong photo-electric action, and, since the metals sodium and potassium themselves show photo-electric action to a very remarkable degree, Elster and Geitel have suggested that the colorations are caused by a solid solution of the metal in the salt.

Although the coloration due to radium rays extends deeper than that due to the cathode rays, when exposed to light the colour fades away at about the same rate in the two cases.

Becquerel[2] found that white phosphorus is changed into the red variety by the action of radium rays. This action was shown to be due mainly to the β rays. The secondary radiation set up by the primary rays also produced a marked effect. Radium rays, like ordinary light rays, also caused a precipitate of calomel in the presence of oxalic acid.

Hardy and Miss Wilcock[3] found that a solution of iodoform in chloroform turned purple after exposure for 5 minutes to the rays from 5 milligrams of radium bromide. This action is due to the liberation of iodine. By testing the effect of screens of different thicknesses, over the radium, this action was found to be mainly due to the β rays from the radium. Röntgen rays produce a similar coloration.

Hardy[4] also observed an action of the radium rays on the coagulation of globulin. Two solutions of globulin from ox serum were used, one made electro-positive by adding acetic acid, and the other electro-negative by adding ammonia. When the globulin was exposed close to the radium in naked drops, the opalescence of the electro-positive solution rapidly diminished, showing that the

  1. Elster and Geitel, Phys. Zeit. p. 113, No. 3, 1902.
  2. Becquerel, C. R. 133, p. 709, 1901.
  3. Hardy and Miss Wilcock, Proc. Roy. Soc. 72, p. 200, 1903.
  4. Hardy, Proc. Physiolog. Soc. May 16, 1903.