's Influence on Keshub Chunder Sen.
A more painful misunderstanding has arisen with regard to the exact relationship between R&makrzshaa and Keshub Chunder Sen. A disciple may mean many things, but Keshub Chunder Sen was never chary in giving credit where credit was due, and he was the last man to withhold the name of master and teacher from R^mak/rsh^a or any one else from whom he had received inspiration, encourage- ment, or instruction. 'Whoever he may be,' he writes,
- I desire to learn from him. If I see an ordinary minstrel,
I love to learn at his feet. If an ascetic comes, I consider that a lac of rupees has come to my house. I learn much by hearing his hymns. ... I can clearly perceive that when- ever a saint takes leave of me he pours into my heart his virtues. To some extent I become like him I am a born discifle? On the other hand, no one repudiated the title of Master or Guru more emphatically than R^makr/sh^a. A relative of Keshub Chunder Sen, however, who evidently completely misapprehended what was implied by the influence which I said that Rdmaksha had exercised on Keshub Chunder Sen, Mozoomdar, and others as his disciples, is very anxious to establish the priority of Keshub Chunder Sen, as if there could be priority in philosophical or religious truth. ' It was Keshub Chunder/ he tells us, ' who brought Rmaksha out of obscurity.' That may be so, but how often have disciples been instrumental in bringing out their master? He then continues to bring charges against R&makr*sha, which may be true or not, but have nothing
