Page:Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election.pdf/130

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.

U.S. Department of Justice

Attorney Work Product // May Contain Material Protected Under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)

relationship with "mr T has been thrown down the drain."[1] The next month, Goldstone commented to Emin Agalarov about the volume of publicity the June 9 meeting had generated, stating that his "reputation [was] basically destroyed by this dumb meeting which your father insisted on even though Ike and Me told him would be bad news and not to do."[2] Goldstone added, "I am not able to respond out of courtesy to you and your father. So am painted as some mysterious link to Putin."[3]

After public reporting on the June 9 meeting began, representatives from the Trump Organization again reached out to participants. On July 10, 2017, Futerfas sent Goldstone an email with a proposed statement for Goldstone to issue, which read:

As the person who arranged the meeting, I can definitively state that the statements | have read by Donald Trump Jr. are 100% accurate, The meeting was a complete waste of time and Don was never told Ms. Veselnitskaya's name prior to the meeting. Ms. Veselnitskaya mostly talked about the Magnitsky Act and Russian adoption laws and the meeting lasted 20 to 30 minutes at most. There was never any follow up and nothing ever came of the meeting. [4]

Grand Jury   the statement drafted by Trump Organization representatives was Grand Jury [5] He proposed a different statement, asserting that he had been asked "by [his] client in Moscow — Emin Agalarov — to facilitate a meeting between a Russian attorney (Natalia Veselnitzkaya [sic]) and Donald Trump Jr. The lawyer had apparently stated that she had some information regarding funding to the DNC from Russia, which she believed Mr. Trump Jr. might find interesting."[6] Goldstone never released either statement."[7]

On the Russian end, there were also communications about what participants should say about the June 9 meeting. Specifically, the organization that hired Samochornov—an anti-Magnitsky Act group controlled by Veselnitskaya and the owner of Prevezon—offered to pay $90,000 of Samochornov's legal fees.[8] At Veselnitskaya's request, the organization sent Samochornov a transcript of a Veselnitskaya press interview, and Samochornov understood that the organization would pay his legal fees only if he made statements consistent with Veselnitskaya's.[9] Samochornov declined, telling the Office that he did not want to perjure


  1. OSC-KAV_01197 (7/11-12/17 Text Messages, Kaveladze & E. Agalarov); Grand Jury 
  2. Investigative Technique 
  3. Investigative Technique 
  4. 7/10/17 Email, Goldstone to Futerfas & Garten.
  5. Grand Jury 
  6. 7/10/17 Email, Goldstone to Futerfas & Garten.
  7. Grand Jury 
  8. Samochornov 7/13/17 302, at 1; Grand Jury 
  9. Grand Jury  Samochornov 7/13/17 302, at 1.

122