Page:Roy Ralph Hottman - Practical Collection Procedure (1923).pdf/82

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
68
PRACTICAL COLLECTION PROCEDURE

letters sent, to the ledger account, is of particular value. One is enabled at a glance to determine just how difficult it was to collect a previous account, and just where to com- mence in collecting a current bill.


Multigraph Letters.

While in some instances, houses are able to secure a perfect match for filling in the date, the salutation, and the amount in multigraphed letters, in the great majority of cases a perfect match is not secured, and to me it seems, therefore, that multigraphed letters should not be used. The urgency of a letter, the directness, the per- sonality, is entirely lost when a debtor is enabled to ascer- tain that he has been sent a multigraphed form letter, and a consequent delay in remitting ensues. No debtor’s attitude is improved by the belief that he is not worth the trouble of a personally dictated letter. Even though a good match is obtainable in multigraphed letters, compe- tent stenographers are necessary to get the salutation cor- tectly spaced and perfectly parallel with the body of the letter, so as to give it the appearance of a personal letter, and to fill in the amount so precisely that it is impossible to know it is a multigraphed letter. This is frequently impossible.

I have seen multigraphed collection letters that were so carelessly filled in and so imperfectly matched, that ab- solutely no one would consider them anything but a mul- tigraphed letter. One of them in particular had alto- gether different shades of ink, the body of the letter was “shaded” due to faulty multigraphing, and the paper