Page:Russian Realities and Problems - ed. James Duff (1917).djvu/202

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
188
Science and Learning in Russia

where he made valuable zoological collections and ethnographical observations[1].

In course of time these collections and observations were scientifically treated either by the travellers themselves, or by independent investigators, and were brought into connection with anthropological studies: one of the pupils of Bogdanov, Anutchin, well known also for his geographical works, began to deliver lectures on anthropology and organized the Anthropological Museum at the University of Moscow; he published his investigations on the tribe of the Ainu, comparing archaeological data with ethnographical observations on the bow and arrows, and on the use of sledges, canoes and horses in burial rites.

The rise of geological science in Russia was of later origin. Messerschmidt and other travellers had gathered geological data; and Lomonosov had anticipated some modern views on the gradual formation of successive strata in connection with the internal heat of the earth, and on the origin of subterranean minerals; but, even after the inauguration of the Mining School in 1774, geology was not studied as a separate science until Murchison made an attempt to give a general conception of the geological structure of Russia and the Ural Mountains, which had great influence on subsequent geological studies. Before Murchison's date, however, Helmersen began his travels: he made a study of the

  1. А. Пыпинъ, Исторіа русской зтнографіи, С.-Пб. 1бб89, vol. I, pp. 78–112. П. Семеновъ, Исторія полувҍковой дҍятельностн Императорскаго Русскаго Географическаго Общества, С.-Иб. 1896, pp. 1–111.