109. § 108-109. by the forms in . Therefore antalon sazontera, not tud, gadn't sariefn. P. 5, 1, 2ly Excelling or being weak in, blaming on account of, wicked- ness with respect to is to be denoted by the instrumental, or by 46; 47. , not by the ablative proper. For this reason, in the verse quoted by Pat. I, p. 2: auft an (a word, wrong on account of its accent or of its sound), a: and aufa: are in- terchangeable with and , not with and aud erin Likewise, in Ch. Up. 4, 17, 4 - quoted page 77 of this book REAL are synonymous with the instrum., and the abl. would not be allowed. agen Rem. It should however be remembered, that this rule does not apply neither to the points of comparison f. i. mai nor to the ablative of comparison. 194:- - - 81 a P. 5. 4, 45, 45. P. 5, 4, 3ly If the ablative is to express the »whence" except in the P. 5, 4, case recorded sub 1 is equivalent with the regular case- endings. The same applies to the abl., depending on the prepos. f. 44. Rem. Pânini does not give any rule about using the abl. in with such adverbs and pronouns as , fà, . Now, abla- tives of that kind are certainly not expressing the apádána, as they are taught in the third chapter of the 2d adhyâya, not in the fourth of the 1st. Accordingly it would not be allowed using with them. Yet practice is not wholly consistent therewith, O L f. i.
1: = 48. 4ly In two cases: is interchangeable with a genitive, but not P. 5, 4, with an abl. a.) when expressing the standing on one's side at 49. ( ), b.) if denoting the disease, against which P. 5, 4, one applies some remedy or cure: gata: (or :] something against diarrhoea). cha (give CHAPTER VII. Genitive. ¹) The fundamental notion of the genitive or sixth 6 1) On the genitive in Sanskrit, especially in the dialect of the Rg- vedamantras, there exists a monography of Dr. SIECKE de genitivo in lin- gua Sanscritica imprimis Vedica usu, Berlin, 1869.
