Page:Satava v. Lowry.pdf/5

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
SATAVA v. LOWRY
Cite as 323 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2003)
809

In Hawaii, Satava’s sculptures have appeared in tourist brochures and art magazaines. The sculptures are sold in sixteen galleries and gift shops, and they appear in many store windows. Lowry admits he saw a picture of Satava’s jellyfish sculptures in American Craft magazine in 1996. And he admits he examined a Satava jellyfish sculpture that a customer brought him for repair in 1997.

Glass-in-glass sculpture is a centuries-old art form that consists of a glass sculpture inside a second glass layer, commonly called the shroud. The artist creates an inner glass sculpture and then dips it into molten glass, encasing it in a solid outer glass shroud. The shroud is malleable before it cools, and the artist can manipulate it into any shape he or she desires.

Satava filed suit against Lowry accusing him of copyright infringement. Satava requested, and the district court granted, a preliminary injunction, enjoining Lowry from making sculptures that resemble Satava’s.[1] Lowry appealed to us.