Page:Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, Volume 1.djvu/104

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

90 /. BEFORE THE NORMAN CONQUEST was that of the bishops, abbots, and other great ecclesiastics. This learning, indeed, was all the more available and influen- tial because, before the Norman Conquest, there were no separate ecclesiastical courts in England. There were no clerks nor, apparently, any permanent officials of the popular courts; their judgments proceeded from the meeting itself, not from its presiding officer, and were regularly preserved only in the memory of the suitors. A modern student or man of business will at first sight wonder how this rude and scanty provision for judicial affairs can have sufficed even in the Dark Ages. But when we have reflected on the actual state of Anglo-Saxon society, we may be apt to think that at times the hundred and the county court found too little to do rather than too much. The materials for what we now call civil business practically did not exist. There is now no doubt among scholars that the primary court was the hundred court. If the township had any regular meeting (which is quite uncertain), that meeting was not a judicial body. The King, on the other hand, assisted by his Council of wise men, the Witan,^ had a superior authority in reserve. It was allowable to seek justice at the king's hands if one had failed, after due diligence, to obtain it in the hundred or the county court. Moreover the Witan assumed jurisdiction in the first instance where land granted by the king was in question, and perhaps in other cases where religious foundations or the king's great men were concerned. Several examples of such proceedings are recorded, recited as we should say in modern technical speech, in extant land- charters which declare and confirm the result of disputes, and therefore we know more of them than we do of the ordinary proceedings in the county and hundred courts, of which no written record was kept. But they can have had very little bearing, if any, on the daily lives of the smaller folk. In important cases the county court might be strength- ened by adding the chief men of other counties ; and, when thus reinforced, there is hardly anything to distinguish it ^ There is more authority for this short form than for the fuller Witena-Gem6t (not witendgemot, as sometimes mispronounced by per- sons ignorant of Old-English inflexions).