6. ENGLISH LAW AND THE RENAISSANCE * By Feederic William Maitland ^ WERE we to recall to life the good Sir Robert Rede who endowed lectures in this university, we might reasonably hope that he would approve and admire the fruit that in these last years has been borne by his liberality. And then, as in private duty or private interest bound, I would have him speak thus : " Yes, it is marvellous and more than marvellous this triumph of the sciences that my modest rent- charge stimulates you annually to record; nor do I wonder less at what my lecturers have said of humane letters and the fine arts, of the history of all times and of my time, of Erasmus whom I remember, and that age of the Renais- sance (as you call it) in which (so you say) I lived. But there is one matter, one science (for such we accounted it) of which they seem to have said little or nothing; and it happens to be a matter, a science, in which I used to take some interest and which I endeavoured to teach. You have not, I hope, forgotten that I was not only an English judge, but, what is more, a reader in English law." ^ Six years ago a great master of history, whose untimely death we are deploring, worked the establishment of the Rede lectures into the picture that he drew for us of The Early Renaissance in England.^ He brought Rede's name into contact with the names of Fisher and More. That, no doubt, is the right environment, and this pious founder's care for the humanities, for logic and for philosophy natural and
- The Rede Lecture for 1901 (Cambridge: University Press).
- A biographical note of this author is prefixed to Essay No. 1, ante,
p. 7.
- Robert Rede was Autumn Reader at Lincoln's Inn in 1481, Lent
Reader in 1485: Black Book of Lincoln's Inn, vol. i., pp. 71, 83.
- Creighton, The Early Renaissance in England, Camb. 1895.
168
