Page:Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, Volume 1.djvu/361

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

10. BRYCE: ROME AND ENGLAND 347 crepancies of the old law, bringing it nearer to what they thought substantial justice, and presenting it in concise and convenient form. Plato desired to see philosophy in the seat of power, and in Justinian philosophic theory had a chance such as it seldom gets of effecting permanently important changes by a few sweeping measures. Yet theory might have failed if it had not been reinforced by the vanity of an auto- crat who desired to leave behind him an enduring monu- ment. This rapid survey has shown us that two forces were always operative on the development of Roman law — inter- nal political changes and the influence of the surrounding countries. As Rome conquered and Romanized them, they compelled her institutions to transform themselves, and her law to expand. Economic conditions, speculative thought and religion had each and all of them a share in the course which reforms took, yet a subordinate share. IV. Outline of the Progress of Legal Changes in England Let us now turn to England and see what have been the forces that have from time to time brought about and guided the march of legal change, and what have been the relations of that change to the general history of the country. As with Rome we began at the moment when the ancient customs were first committed to writing and embodied in a comprehensive statute, so in England it is convenient to begin at the epoch when the establishment of the King's Courts enabled the judges to set about creating out of the mass of local customs a body of precedents which gave to those cus- toms definiteness, consistency and uniformity. Justice, fixed and unswerving justice, was in the earlier Middle Ages the chief need of the world, in England as in all mediaeval countries ; and the anarchy of Stephen's reign had disposed men to welcome a strong government, and to acquiesce in stretches of royal power that would otherwise have been distasteful. Henry II was a man of great force of character and untiring energy, nor was he wanting in the talent for selecting capable officials. He had to struggle, not only