Page:Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, Volume 1.djvu/492

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

478 IV. THE NINETEENTH CENTURY tion there were some laymen, and there were to have been others in the county judicatures. These were not welcomed by the lawyers,^ and, no doubt, they did some harm; but they were " expert assessors," and also they brought public opinion to bear, as it is now brought by the Press to bear, upon jurisprudence and legal proceedings. Like the asses- sors in France and Germany, like those suggested by the Judicature Commission, and even like a jury, they gave the judicium to the lawyers' jus. That separation of duties, says Mommsen, and the tendency of pleadings to a clear issue, were the distinctive excellences of Roman Law."^ On the abolition of the House of Lords some of the Common Law judges. Hale, Rolle, Saint John, sat in the Commons. The practice of appointing judges " during their good be- haviour " was that of Spain and of mediaeval England, and was once, at least, adopted by Charles. Under the Common- wealth it was established, and after the Restoration it was by degrees, in the course of a century, established again.® Up to the time of the Great Rebellion judges had bought their places for fabulous sums, and had received in fees, bribes, and perquisites sums equally fabulous ; * and the in- equality of their incomes led to the conflicts of jurisdiction of which I have spoken. The Puritans struck at the root of this: they seized the notion that a law court is for the advantage of the community — not a shop having the monop- oly of a certain kind of justice; they laid the foundation of the suitors' fee fund ; they had all fees paid into a public account; they gave the judges fixed, but handsome, salaries; they did their best to check judicial simony.^

  • Clayton, I. c. But see a petition against the monopoly of lawyers

(British Museum iso. g- 12) , and the 1st Rep. of the Judicature Com- mission, p. 14. *' ^ » " Hist. Rome," bk. 2, c. 8, n. » See Walter's case (Whitelock 11, 16: Kal. St. Pap. [Dom. Ser.], 1629-31, pp. 76-8), and Rolle's, Whitelock's, Keble's I'lsle's, Hale's. See also 1 Sid. 2: St. 12 and 13 Will. iij. c. 2, §3: Hallam, c. 15 (compared with Macauley, c. 18): St. 1 Ann. s. 1, c. 8: 2 Ld. Raym. 747: St. 1 Geo. iij. c. 23: Blackstone in Steph. " Comm.," bk. 4, pt. 1, c. 6.

  • As Vernon, J.; Richardson, C. B.; Caesar and Buck: Jones, "The

new returna hrevium," pp. 23, 30. » Comm. Journ. 5,528; 7,670: 6 Somers's Tracts, 186, 189: Whitelock, 382, 680: Cock, "Christian Government," p. 186.