IV.
THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN FREDERICK BARBAROSSA AND ALEXANDER III.
(Doeberl iv. pp. 165-247.)
(a.) Epistola Minor of the Comicil of Pavia, Feb. 5-11, 1160 a.d. (Encyclic.)
Inasmuch as the turmoil in which the apostolic see has been involved has exceedingly wounded the hearts of Chi'istians, we, who have congregated at Pavia to heal the schisms and to restore the peace of the church, have thought best fully to intimate to all of you the nature of the case and the manner of procedure and the ruling of the holy council. We do this in order that the facts shown forth simply and truly in the present writing may forcibly expel any false impressions which the hearers may have conceived, and that henceforth they may not be deceived by schismatic writings.
When, therefore, all of the orthodox congregated at Pavia in the name of the Lord had taken their seats, the case was lawfully and canonically tried and diligently investigated during 7 successive days. And it was sufficiently and canonically proved in the eyes of the council through capable witnesses, that, in the church of St Peter, our lord pope Victor and no other had been elected and solemnly emmantled by the sounder part of the cardinals — at the request of the people and with the consent and at the desire of the clergy; and that, Roland the former chancellor being present and not objecting, he was placed in the chair of St Peter; and that there, by the clergy of Rome and the cardinals, a grand Te Deum was sung to him; and that thence, wearing the stoles and other papal insignia, he was led to the palace.
And the clergy and people being asked according to custom by the notary if they agreed, replied thrice with a loud voice: "We agree."
It was proved also that Roland, on the twelfth day after the promotion of pope Victor, going forth from Rome was
