out the formality of adjournment, the members rushing from their seats with precipitation and confusion*
But all his efforts were in vain. Either the justice of the opposing cause, or the powers of his adversaries, or the prejudged opinions and instructions of the mem- bers, rendered his reasoning and his eloquence equally unavailing. Out of a house, composed of one hundred and sixty-eight members, the question of ratification was carried by a majority of ten. Mr. Henry himself, seem- ed to have a presage of this result. After the storm which has been mentioned, colonel Innis, who, in his character of attorney general, had been hitherto attend- ing a court of oyer and terminer, came into the house, and the debate was renewed. Mr. Henry, in answer- ing him, closed the last speech which he delivered on. the floor, with the following remarks:
" I beg pardon of this house, for having taken up more time than came to my share; and I thank them for the patience and polite attention with which I have been heard. If I shall be in the minority, I shall have those painful sensations which arise from a conviction of being overpowered in a good cause. Yet, I will be a peaceable citizen! My head, my hand, and my heart, shall be free to retrieve the loss of liberty, and remove the defects of that system, in a constitutional ivay. I wish not to go to violence, but will wait with hopes that
��* The words above quoted are those of judge Archibald Stuart ; a gentle- man who was present, a member of the convention, and one of those who voted against the side of the question, supported by Mr. Henry. The inci- dent as given in the text, is wholly founded on the statements of those who were witnesses of the scene; and by comparing it with the coiTesponding passage in the printed debates, the reader may decide how far these are to be relied on, as specimens of Mr. Henry's eloquence.
pp
�� �
