Page:Southern Historical Society Papers volume 35.djvu/103

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
The Career of Stonewall Jackson.
89

Jackson rode up to a gallant colonel, commanding a brigade, and said: "Colonel, the orders were for you to move in the rear of General —————— to-day."

The colonel replied in a rather rollicking tone: "Yes, I knew that General, but my fellows were ready to march, and General —————— was not, and I thought that it would make no difference which moved first, as we are not going to fight to-day. But if you prefer it, I can halt my brigade, and let General —————— pass us." Jackson replied, almost fiercely: "How do you know that we are not going to fight to-day? Besides, colonel, I want you to distinctly understand that you must obey my orders first, and reason about them afterwards. Consider yourself under arrest, sir, and march in the rear of your brigade."

In one of his battles, a brigadier rode up to him and asked: "General, did you order me to move my brigade across that plane, and charge that battery?" "Yes, sir, I sent you that order," said Jackson, "Have you obeyed it?"

"Why, no! General, the enemy's artillery will sweep that field, and my brigade would be literally annihilated if I move across it."

Jackson replied, in tones not to be mistaken: "General, I always try to take care of my wounded and bury my dead. Obey that order, sir, and do it at once."

It is needless to add that the order was obeyed, and the battery captured.

At one time he put every commander of a battery in A. P. Hill's Light Division under arrest for some slight disobedience of orders.

He put A. P. Hill under arrest several times, and there were charges and countercharges between these accomplished soldiers, until General Lee intervened to effect a compromise.

HIS STRICT DISCIPLINE.

Jackson probably put more officers under arrest than all other Confederate generals combined. He was probably sometimes too severe. I have reason to believe that General Lee thought that he was too severe both on Garnett and A. P. Hill. But there can be little doubt that if there had been more stern dis-