Page:Special 301 Report 1995.pdf/1

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20506

  95–32
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Saturday, April 29, 1995
Contact:  Anne Luzzatto
Dianne Wildman
Kirsten Powers
Jamal Simmons
(202) 395–3230

USTR ANNOUNCES TWO DECISIONS:
TITLE VII AND SPECIAL 301

United States Trade Representative Mickey Kantor today announced decisions and initiated actions in two important areas: Special 301 -- protection of intellectual property rights -- and Title VII/discrimination in foreign government procurement.

Today's decisions reflect the Administration's continued resolve to take strong measures to ensure comparable market access and intellectual property protection for U.S. products and to promote more open foreign procurement practices -- measures which are key to this Administration's policy of opening markets and creating opportunities for U.S. companies and jobs for U.S. workers.

Title VII

In announcing this year's results, Ambassador Kantor called Title VII "a valuable tool in breaking down discriminatory government procurement practices around the world." During this Administration alone, Title VII has been used to achieve a number of agreements, including:

 —  the 1993 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the EU, followed up by the 1994 Marrakesh Agreement;
 —  a construction agreement with Japan in January 1994;
 —  and, in October 1994, the Framework Agreements with Japan on telecommunications and medical technology.

1995 Results

This year, no new identifications were made, but several areas deserving special attention as issues of substantial concern were highlighted in this year's report to Congress. These issues are:

Corruption and Transparency: The issue of corruption in foreign procurement and lack of transparency in procurement practices is an important one. Kantor said, "This Administration is determined to increase public awareness of these problems and push initiatives to clean up government procurement practices around the world. Efforts to eliminate corruption in government procurement and increase transparency will not only eliminate persistent international trade barriers, but will also benefit foreign governments' standing with their domestic constituencies and increase their efficiency."

The United States has taken the lead in promoting international disciplines against corruption, including through work in the OECD and the Summit of the Americas (SOA).