Systems of Sanskrit Grammar § 84 - ] A few more names are given by Aufrecht, but they need not detain us here. Of modern commentaries on the Mugdhabodha there is no end. Most of these are produced in Bengal. 108 85. Supplements and accessory treatises of the Mugdhabodha.-- As the aim of the Mugdhabodha was brevity, it was inevi- table that it should have omitted several obscure rules. Accordingly we find three attempts made one after another to supply the defects: by Nandakiśorabhatta, by Käsiśvara, and by Rāmatarkavāgisa. The first of these gives his date--aaqasizzaníãà, that is, A. D. 1398. He was therefore a very early writer. Of other modern attempts we need not speak anything. As to accessory treatises Bopadeva himself left none, except the Kavikalpadruma, which is a list of roots ar- ranged accordingly to their endings, and a commentary on the same called Kamadhenu, the chief import- ance of which for us lies in its numerous quotations. Attempts more or less successful have been since made to give to this school other accessory treatises. Ramachandra- vidyabhushṇa (Šaka 1610) wrote a Paribhāshāvṛitti. Rāma- tarkavägisa put together an alphabetically arranged Uņā- dikośa. And there are other minor works attributed, probably by mistake, to Bopadeva himself. The Jaumara School 86. The Jaumara school of Kramadīśvara. The name by which this school is popularly known is a misnomer. It comes from Jumaranandi the most celebrated writer of the school, though we have reason to think that he lived some time after its founder. This was Kramadīśvara styled andernfor. Nothing is known of Kramadiśvara's parentage and nativity. His work is called Sankshipta- sära, indicating by it that it was an epitome or an abridg- ment of some larger grammar; and as it could be the
