Systems of Sanskrit Grammar § 88 - ] title it is quoted by Bharata the commentator on the Bhattikävya. Jumarnandi's seems to have been the ear- liest exposition of this system. He has also revised for this school the Pāṇiniya Dhātupāṭha.¹ IIO Next to Rasavati, Goyichandra's commentary deserves a brief mention. Goyichandra styles himself aftenen, which may be either a patronymic or some religious or political title the significance of which is lost to us. The best part of Goyichandra's commentary is that on the fifth or the Kāraka pāda, which along with its able and learn- ed gloss by Abhiramavidyālañkāra is studied even by the students of other schools for the sake of a correct and complete understanding of syntax. Besides this commen. tary Goyichandra has also written a work on the Uņādis, and a list of some 127 paribhashās. Goyichandra's commentary is further commented upon by Nyayapañchanana, son of Vidyâvinoda, a ms. of which is dated Šaka 1634; by Keśavadeva styled Tarka- panchananabhattacharya; by Chandrasekharavidyalan- kāra; by Vamśivādana, Harirama, and many others. In- dependently of Goyichandra's gloss there do not seem to be in existence any notable commentaries on the Jaumara grammar. Colebrooke mentions only one by Gopāla- chakravarti. 89. Present status of the Jaumara school.-Next to the Kät- antra this grammar has the widest circulation at present in Western Bengal, where it disputes with Mugdhabodha the palm for supremacy. The literary activity of the school--such as it is-is not yet over. 1 Compare ms. no. 196 of Notices, 3 The commentary is calledarentur. second series, vol. i. gare, and regarding it the Explained as f fenten author says-n eru fag et amet HAY |
