Page:T.C. Memo. 2012-281.pdf/54

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

[*54] 

contrast, respondent introduced credible evidence that petitioner provided no records to Special Agent Schneider and that petitioner misled Special Agent Schneider about the amounts of, and her access to, cash hoards at the 29 Cummings Road property.[1] Respondent also introduced credible evidence that petitioner and her attorney attempted to impede Revenue Agent AlyceFaye's civil investigation of petitioner.[2] Petitioner attempted to cooperate with respondent only after she had already exerted considerable resistance to respondent's collection efforts. See Powell v. Granquist, 252 F.2d 56, 61 (9th Cir. 1958). Petitioner's failure to cooperate with tax authorities is indicative of fraud.

f. Engaging In or Concealing Illegal Activities

Engaging in illegal activity, even if the taxpayer is not charged with a tax crime, is circumstantial evidence of fraud. Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99

___________

  1. Petitioner signed a notice attempting to discourage respondent's criminal investigators from entering her properties or performing their official duties. The notice purported to warn Federal agents that petitioner would pursue legal remedies against the Federal agents who interfered.
  2. Revenue Agent AlyceFaye testified that although she did not specifically request any records from petitioner during a telephone conference with petitioner and her attorney she attempted to request records but petitioner repeatedly interrupted and cut off her requests. She further testified that petitioner provided no records or documentation during the course of the examination.