Page:Table-Talk (1821).djvu/337

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS’S DISCOURSES.
325

whatever excellence it may have (and I do not mean to detract from it), never did confer on the artist the character of Genius.” Vol. II. p. 44.

At page 53 we find the following words.

“Whether it is the human figure, an animal, or even inanimate objects, there is nothing, however unpromising in appearance, but may be raised into dignity, convey sentiment, and produce emotion, in the hands of a Painter of genius. What was said of Virgil, that he threw even the dung about the ground with an air of dignity, may be applied to Titian; whatever he touched, however naturally mean, and habitually familiar, by a kind of magic he invested with grandeur and importance.”—No, not by magic, but by seeking and finding in individual nature, and combined with details of every kind, that grace and grandeur and unity of effect which Sir Joshua supposes to be a mere creation of the artist’s brain! Titian’s practice was, I conceive, to give general appearances with individual forms and circumstances: Sir Joshua’s theory goes too often, and in its prevailing bias, to separate the two things as inconsistent with each other, and thereby to destroy or bring into question that union of striking effect with accuracy of resemblance in which the essence