Page:Technical Support Document - Social Cost of Carbon, Methane and Nitrous Oxide Interim Estimates under Executive Order 13990.pdf/45

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.

U.S. EPA. 2016. Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-06/documents/ejtg_5_6_16_v5.1.pdf

U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board. 2021. SAB Peer Review of the EPA’s Revised Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analysis. January 6. Available at: https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/LookupWebProjectsCurrentBOARD/61C74C0E14BD5956852586550071E058/$File/EPA-SAB-21-002.pdf.

U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2014. Regulatory Impact Analysis: Development of Social Cost of Carbon Estimates. GAO-14-663. July. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-14-663 (accessed February 5, 2021).

U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2020. Social Cost of Carbon: Identifying a Federal Entity to Address the National Academies’ Recommendations Could Strengthen Regulatory Analysis. GAO-20-254. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/assets/710/707776.pdf.

U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP). 2016. The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. Crimmins, A., J. Balbus, J.L. Gamble, C.B. Beard, J.E. Bell, D. Dodgen, R.J. Eisen, N. Fann, M.D. Hawkins, S.C. Herring, L. Jantarasami, D.M. Mills, S. Saha, M.C. Sarofim, J. Trtanj, and L. Ziska, Eds. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 312 pp. https://dx.dio.org/10.7930/J0R49NQX.

U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP). 2018. Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II [Reidmiller, D.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, K.L.M. Lewis, T.K. Maycock, and B.C. Stewart (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 1515 pp. doi: 10.7930/NCA4.2018.

Weitzman, M.L. 1998. Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(3): 201-208.

Weitzman, M.L. 1999. Just keep discounting, but. In Discounting and Intergenerational Equity, Portney, P.R. and Weyant, J.P. (Ed.) Resources for the Future, New York.

Weitzman, M.L. 2001. Gamma Discounting. American Economic Review 91(1): 260-271.

Whittington and MacRae. 1986. The Issue of Standing in Cost-Benefit Analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5(4): 665-682.

Wong, T. E., Bakker, A. M. R., Ruckert, K., Applegate, P., Slangen, A. B. A., and Keller, K. 2017. BRICK v0.2, a simple, accessible, and transparent model framework for climate and regional sea-level projections. Geosci. Model Dev., 10: 2741–2760, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2741-2017.

Yumashev, D., Hope, C., Schaefer, K. et al. 2019. Climate policy implications of nonlinear decline of Arctic land permafrost and other cryosphere elements. Nat Commun 10, 1900.

Yumashev, D. 2020. PAGE-ICE Integrated Assessment Model. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342396462_PAGE-ICE_Integrated_Assessment_Model.

Zero Zone, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Energy, 832 F.3d 654 (7th Cir. 2016). Available at: https://casetext.com/case/zero-zone-inc-v-us-dept-of-energy-1 (accessed February 5, 2021).

44