?ation, by their repreFenratives, ?n ?veral parliaments ?t?mb?cd? ?n make h?m. Under this belief I'have [worn to obey h?m, and I defign to obferve that 0ath? part o? which obliges me to d?ovor ?ll ?1 ?cret traitors a?d conspirators ?gainfi ?s ma- ita./$ ?er?n and ?owerrtn?ent 3 fuch trailors and co? fp?rators I conceived thole perfons to he, again? whom I undertook this paperi I thought it my t] there%re to difcover them, as I had fwom to and I think that at lea? I de?rve impnaiff for .pains. Yet has it been of hte malidoufiy reported both h publick and private, that fereral of the Bi?ops have petition'd the King to CupprOs a' feandalous pa- per cMl'd T ?RR m-F ? ? ? u ;, highl? r?e?g, Sine of our figacious news-writer? r'eprclent it, o? the t?o aniz'erfitie?,tbe cbr?ian religion, aad the reformation. By whom this is done, or with what intent, is eafy enough to gue?; but the artifice is fo thin ?d ridicubus, that no b?y, I think, can ? deceiv? by it. It cannot however be an improper time to pro- ?uee rome of my proo? againfi the ?$ns with whom I ha?e enter'd the li?s? from whence ma? appear, whether I who relate, or my let who publi?es? or thq who a& hch enormitNc$ a ain? t?b government? ought to be under a g . PP henriohs f?om ?h? go?emment.? IK for ?ce? ? may be ju.?e in my o?'n care, to be puni?M IVhig: and Tories too for the time thing, is, I think? a little too hard ufige ? 'tis hch fore.flroke and firoke play, as I cannot po?bly under,and. One of my principal evidences is a fermon pr?eh'd May ?9, 17?9, which ! promis'd to give an accoant 0?'when a proper opportunity offered itfilf': aceor- Anti, I willbe in with it next ?edne ?. In th? mean trine, I wdl prefent my reader wtfi hme hr. fie ?ccadifios, which may ferve for coaatenl prooffs,
�
