1.cid, qo? that &y, to acqu?nt us? purpofcly avoid- rag, through his whole ?rea?hraent, to mention the of 0o lqames m'?el or King Charles i ufing, inClead thereof, the?: and fuch-like general expr. e. ffions, as the u ur er, the rightful heir the royalexde, the exi lea monarch, &c. betides whxch, he tingled out fuch incidents in his defcripfion of this our flare of civil and fpirltt,:a! fidtide, as bore a nearer =11ufion to later times than to tho? former ones, which the occafion of the day fuggeffed to him; exhibiting to his gaping audience an unjult parallel between Kisg Charles I. and ]amet I[. and between Oliver Cromwel a?d King This mof.:ld )?lie. murder we committed, ?t ?ems, firll, ?. our aifibedience to the CauRca i and, fe- dreally, our i,,jufliu to the l. By our a,/bb?die?ce totheCavncu ? to prove which, the Cosvoc?x;ov did he, u,a: filehe'd: a-u/our holy mother ?va$ ?ot permitted to take �oun]}l for herOIC. Poor old lewdman! what a fad thing that wai? gent to fhut her holy lip; up .-_nd not �uffer her to tell winter-evening tales of witches and apparitions in a chimney-corner, as /he us'd to do!.-- to be Cure, good man! he did not glance this obliquely upon the pre?nt government for timing her fo now. Seemingly, fiid he. the bifhop? were de?rig'd by a lay- ?er?tntokrabte impudence again! that the vile beafis the people lhould offer to turn a q irated gentleman out of a good diocefe, and an tdied coach and f?x? onl for refufmg to romi to be ? re&l i o? upon any other Fretence whaff0- ever !--Here again without doubt, the preacher did not think of the lay-deprivation of bi?opsat the Revolution. Bt.t, he added, ?e ought t? hie d} God, that many q't?o]} r?ere? d?riv? fithm ?d ?ri=att? ordain f?d ?r?ns, ? ? to maima? the i?alua?le
�
