xw. Tm',.Filha'. 97 ?' I know 'ris commonly urg'd by the/? youths, "m defence of their fw?aring thus, thac conf?e- ,' rin? t. hdr age, they may fly with the poet, ,c &t?I?ravt, menter? iniurat?m gero. I fhat! re- ,' ply fo them in the wfrds of the uniteriley itiilf, "m her own explication of this oath: $i quit in "n#& tortice ?trbo?ur? tiffit, 0 ad ju?nnffun? ,, ardr?utn a.?rt non obligandi i?ipthm, non. ideo ', 'urii trimine extuf?turn rt?udere ? &bet. "f?ar? ?it?ut intoning to lay !?u mmcl uuder ?ni. "o?ligation, he mull not tloer?fore thinl? bir?]?lf "c?f?l?o? ? �?ilt of Pt?j?Y. !f any one thinks ?vere, " I ?ve ?n too in ?ewiag that ? ? univ?fity (?e defign of which is to in?u? "men in virtue and mor?ty) d?s aimoff una- "void?ly fubje? all its mem?rs to dduble Psi. "lwv Of Arch-bi?op ?lb?pn has rightly "'what ?rjury contiffs in,) I ?all only reply, '? 1? you think fit to commum?te what i have "now ?t you, you may expe? farther "wi? rome refitions on the method ? ?aking Dur? ?:c, j, "P. 8. You mention in on? ofyou. r papers, that "the V--------r of OxFoav, Ins forbid all the col- "fee-hour'es there, to take in poor T?_?,x-, under "the halt of being di common'd: pka�e to re- pe y o . commend to hun, or !?s friends, " ?he follo?,in g '.' fmtenc� of bithop W?ylor, a htc member of that F ? t?ailrer-
�
