ch?; a ?&?, whch mo? mm tend to, Mt what v?y f? d?e: for tommou f$?, as ?{or?. define, is w?t ?e mo-R ? ?d ufl?m? think t?mfdv? ?ff?'d y? ts it in ,the moil l?rn? ofim wanting; am? ? ?hout it, and moil of us ?umt? deface Of it i &ch obflades ?d pr?ju?s lie ia its ?y, ,h;t it is attain? (if at all) with .gr?t ?g- ?, ?n, and anxiety; and wh? att?n?? c?ly ?nfld?ion]) it ?mcs accom?n? wit? ?fimy ? ?ntempr. " It wo?d, no d?bt, ? thought a v? untore- nerly and ungentleman-like thing m me, ?o ?ukl I call the whole univerfity of Oxfor d a n o ef f?ds, or fay that they are not endued with eomraeafinjh and I thank heaven I am better bred than to ?y any thing that nvay feem ./hockingl though, by the bye? a m?h better writer, and a finer Gentleman than I getend to be, oiled all the =oddf_o ! but I? was an atben, ?/ou will tiy; and, God forbid,that �hrifliam fhould know no better than he?tbau ! I &fire, however, that my good bruding may not be interpreted as an evidence og their =if dom; fmce it cannot be elteemed any morea proofof'that, than it is of the chafiity of certain ladies reftcling at Bil. lingfgate, or of ?he integrity of certain g?ntlemen, who ufed to meet in Br?dfireet, that I do not, out of the nicene" of my mture, call ?em a lrarceI of Wh--es and R--e?. It i? n/ruM for us to nil at what we do not poffefi: a m?n ?uz; ? fla?e'thinks it im?flible for ?ny.. ? iu .?ee to ? an ?fl maa; an ug? old hag. hat? a Feteyoung ?man? ? a brok?game. fi? ? a m?fl av?on m art& ?rO. In m?n?, whm I h?r t? addl? ?lb ?d griy .... and
�
