N o xxxv. .frankly to us, anti &dar'O, that, n?xt to ]3e;n g Crlr?is?, ? the fl?, he d?r'd to fle the That there wi? men may no longer continue their mi?ake, I hy hold of this opportunity to lure them, (in the name of ;I1 confidering W n ?.? s) that ?e cannot concur with them in this parucu- far; that we haYe as bad an opinion of the P ?ZSD?, anO as gooda one of King G?o?,?swe had ?efore the fitaI8outh.? fcheme was t?t our re?ntments extend only to the ?r?8ors and their accompli?es? that we &fire to ? no R?0s, bat that of ?eabh, and erek}? andbib/irk bapbin?; that we balieve all there .things can be R?sToa?n to us only by the continuance of P?OTZSZa? Succuss?os; and that therefore we will not be banter'd out it by FXLS? vile irony, ?d rafcally double entendre. We affure them, t?t we will nke the King's royal word for it, that he had no ?nd in bringing the? misfortunes upon us. and that he is flncerely concern'd for our relief? we therefore can, by no means, bhme him, for what he could not help, and from w?ch he is willing to deliver us. . Neither cm we po?bly apprehen? ho? R?STO,?ON, which good Mr. M?sr fo ?rnefily &fires to ?6 will, in any meafure, contribute to our advantage; we are grievoufly at a loft to un- &r?and how a va? ad?ition of ne? debts (which muff inevitably be the confequence of this ?i?'d- ?ar bl?g) will ?fe us ?om thole we already groan un&r, unlefi the old one? are to be w]p'd' off make room for the ?e?v ?es, which many of us fl?ould not like at alii we are likewife at a �?r?cdve how the Church of ?ngland (as ill fhe is prefent)will be in a whir better conditio,, under a i?01?(h ?ur/?g fatherD and we cannot lot our lir�i!?dp cloubting, whether the
�
