Page:The Algebra of Mohammed Ben Musa (1831).djvu/112

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

( 96 )

of the sons less the amount of the share of the widow.” Divide the heritage into thirty-two parts. The widow receives one-eighth,[1] namely, four; and each son seven. Consequently the legatee must receive three-sevenths of the share of a son. Add, therefore, to the heritage three-sevenths of the share of a son, that is to say, three parts, which is the amount of the legacy. This gives thirty-five, from which the legatee receives three; and the remaining thirty-two are distributed among the heirs proportionably to their legal shares.

If he leaves two sons and a daughter,[2] and bequeaths to some one as much as would be the share of a third son, if he had one; then you must consider, what (72) would be the share of each son, in case he had three: Assume this to be seven, and for the entire heritage


  1. A widow is entitled to th of the residue; therefore ths of the residue are to be distributed among the sons of the testator. Let be the stranger’s legacy. The widow’s share = ; each son’s share =; and a son’s share, minus the widow’s share = A son’s share = ; the widow’s share= .
  2. A son is entitled to receive twice as much as a daughter. Were there three sons and one daughter, each son would receive ths of the residue. Let be the stranger’s legacy.

    Each Son’s share
    The Daughter’s share
    The Stranger’s legacy