( 167 )
nine dirhems and one-eleventh. This is the legacy. The deduction is one hundred and ninety dirhems and ten-elevenths. According to Abu Hanifah, you call the thing a legacy, and what is obtained on account of the dowry is likewise a legacy.
If the case be the same, but that the donor, having cohabited with her, has bequeathed one-third of his (118) capital, then Abu Hanifah says, that the one-third is halved between the donee and the legatee. Computation:[1] Call the legacy of the person to whom the slave-girl has been given, thing. After the deduction of it, there remain three hundred, less thing. Then take the dowry, which is one-third of thing; so that the donor retains three hundred less one and one-third of thing: the donee’s legacy being, according to Abu Hanifah, one and one-third of thing; according to other lawyers, only thing. The legatee, to whom one-third is bequeathed, receives as much as the legacy of the donee, namely, one and one-third of thing. The donor thus retains three hundred, less two things and
- ↑ The second case is here solved in a different way.
This being halved between the legatee and donee becomes
The donee receives the girl, worth , for .
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}a-x-{\tfrac {\alpha }{a}}x=2[x+{\tfrac {\alpha }{a}}x]\\\therefore \;x={\tfrac {a^{2}}{3[\alpha +a]}}\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/750c66e9a69cb06069684c9ab97f319bc7da621a)
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&&&{\tfrac {\alpha ^{2}}{6[\alpha +a]=37{\tfrac {1}{2}}}}\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/dd5e43adafc33606f1409896b89707962faa9f3d)
