Page:The American Language.djvu/67

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
THE BEGINNINGS OF AMERICAN
51

guage development. I have mentioned the early opposition to dutiable, influential, presidential, lengthy, to locate, to oppose, to advocate, to legislate and to progress. Bogus, reliable and standpoint were attacked with the same academic ferocity. All of them are to be found in Bryant's Index Expurgatorius [1] (circa 1870), and reliable was denounced by Bishop Coxe as "that abominable barbarism" so late as 1886. [2] Edward S. Gould, another uncompromising purist, said of standpoint that it was "the bright particular star…of solemn philological blundering" and "the very counterpart of Dogberry's non–com." [3] Gould also protested against to jeopardize, leniency and to demean, and Richard Grant White joined him in an onslaught upon to donate. But all of these words are in good use in the United States today, and some of them have gone over into English.[4]

§4

Changed Meanings—A number of the foregoing contributions to the American vocabulary, of course, were simply common English words with changed meanings. To squat, in the sense of to crouch, had been sound English for centuries; what the colonists did was to attach a figurative meaning to it, and then bring that figurative meaning into wider usage than the literal meaning. In a somewhat similar manner they changed the significance of pond, as I have pointed out. So, too, with creek. In English it designated (and still designates) a small inlet or arm of a large river or of the sea; in American, so early as 1674, it designated any small stream. Many other such changed meanings crept into American in the early days. A typical one was the use of lot to designate a parcel of land. Thornton says, perhaps inaccurately, that it originated in the fact that the land in New England was distributed by lot. Whatever the truth, lot,

  1. Reprinted in Helpful Hints in Writing and Reading, comp. by Grenville Kleiser; New York, 1911, pp. 15-17.
  2. A. Cleveland Coxe: Americanisms in England, Forum, Oct., 1886.
  3. Edwin S. Gould: Good English, or, Popular Errors in Language: New York, 1867; pp. 25–27.
  4. Cf. Ch. I, § 5, and Ch. V ,§ 1.