Here is a picture of Mr. de Young, drawn by one of his wage-slaves, a man who for many years has helped to run his profit-machine:
He uses much perfume, and is extremely conceited. He is author
of the remark that no reporter is worth more than twenty dollars a
week, or ever will be. He is a secret laugh-producer because of his
inordinate love for the camera spotlight. Strangely enough, his likeness
is seldom to be found in any paper except his own; the
"Chronicle's" camera men have standing instructions at public gatherings
to pay as little attention to other men as possible and to concentrate
on de Young. On his own paper everybody is Jones or Smith
except himself. He must always be referred to as Mr. de Young.
Owner of much valuable real estate near Golden Gate park, he made
a vigorous fight to have the Panama-Pacific Exposition located in the
park, hoping thereby to increase the value of his holdings. Defeated,
he turned his wrath on the exposition officials, and denounces them at
every opportunity. Mention of President C. C. Moore of the Exposition
Company is forbidden in the columns of the "Chronicle."
There are differences, of course, in the moral character of
men. There are some men who do not take part in large-scale
real-estate intrigues, and some who do not live with opera-singers;
there are capitalists who pay their debts, and regard
their word of honor as their bond. And there have been newspapers
owned by such men, and conducted according to such
principles. You could not buy the editorial support of the
"Springfield Republican" or the "Baltimore Sun"; you could
not buy the advertising space of these papers for the cheaper
and more obvious kinds of fraud. But ask yourself this question:
Is there a newspaper in America which will print news
unfavorable to department-stores? If the girl-slaves of the
local department-store go on strike, will the newspaper maintain
their right to picket? Will it even print the truth about
what they do and say?
Some years ago a one-time teacher of mine was killed by falling down the elevator-shaft of a New York department-store. I noted that my newspaper did not give the name of the department-store. As a matter of curiosity, I bought all the newspapers, and discovered that none of them gave the name of the department-store. It was not absolutely essential, of course; my one-time teacher was just as dead as if the name of the store had been given. But suppose the accident had taken place at the People's House, owned by the Socialists—would all the newspapers of New York have withheld the name of the place?
