Colony, while the fact is that the Responsible Government is trying to materially alter the circumstances which existed at the time it was granted. Would not Downing Street be justified in saying, “We entrusted you with Responsible Government under certain circumstances. These have now become absolutely changed, brought about by your Bill of last year. You have brought about a condition of things that is so fraught with danger to the whole British Constitution and British notion of Justice that it is our clear duty not to allow you to trifle with the fundamental principles on which the British Constitution is based.”?
The time when the Responsible Government was accepted was, I submit, the time when Mr. Maydon’s objection might have been valid. Whether Responsible Government would ever have been granted, had the European Colonists insisted upon disfranchisement of the Indians is another question.[1]
From a pamphlet printed by T. L. Cullingworth, Printer, 40 Field Street, Durban, 1895
- ↑ For Press reactions to this pamphlet, vide the Early Phase, pp. 592-6.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "ref1" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "ref2" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "ref3" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "ref4" defined in <references> is not used in prior text.
