ready to receive it. They must wait till they attain the requisite moral and intellectual growth. Before this is reached, they can receive it but in name, and are detained from the ruder, and to them more congenial, form, only at the expense of most rigorous laws, suffering, and bloodshed. Before the Exile the Hebrews constantly revolted; afterwards they never returned to the ruder worship, but ten tribes of the nation were gone for ever.[1]
In the more recent conflict of Monotheism and Polytheism, the history of the Christian and Mahometan religions shows what suffering is endured first by the advocates of the new, and next by those of the old faith, before the rude doctrine could give place to the better. War and extermination do their work, and remove the unbelieving. Many a country has been Christianized or Mahometanized by the sword. These things have taken place within a few centuries; when the conquering religion was called Christianity. Are the wars of Charlemagne forgotten? Go back thousands of years, to the strife between sacerdotal Polytheism and Fetichism, when each was a more bloody faith, and imagination cannot paint the horrors of the struggle.
Now, each of these forms represented an Idea of the
popular consciousness which passed for a truth, or it could
not be embraced; for a great truth, or it would not
prevail widely; yes, for all of truth the man could receive at
the time he embraced it. We creep before walking.
Mankind has likewise an infancy, though it will at length
put away childish things. Each of these forms did the
world service in its day. Its truth was permanent; its
error, the result of the imperfect development of man's
faculties. It happens in religious as in scientific matters,
that a doctrine contains both truth and falsehood. It is
accepted for its truth or the appearance of truth. At first
the falsehood does little harm, for it comes in contact with
no active faculty in man which detects it.[2] But gradually
- ↑ See Newman's Hebrew Monarchy, Lond. 1847, Ch. IX. Ewald, ubi sup. B. II. p. 92, et seq. Anhang zum 2ten Band. III. (1) p. 197, et seq.
- ↑ We often see the most strange inconsistency between a man's conduct and his creed. Roman Lucretia sacrificed to Venus. The worshipper of Jupiter did not imitate his vices; nor does the modern devotee of some unholy creed, with a Christian name, become what the creed logically demands. A man may hold
