Page:The Complete Peerage Ed 1 Vol 7.djvu/332

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

330 SURREY. Dukedom. /. Thomas ( i>e Hoi.and), Earl of Kent, h. 1374, «uc. I 1 <?Q7 to 8»* dignity, 25 April 1307, unci was cr. a few months Utter, 28 .Sep.

  • " f • 1307, DUKE OP SURREY, but was degraded from kit Dukedom,

„" 8 Oct. 1399. bjr the Pari, of the new King (Hen. IV.). and beheaded 1 fi Jan. 1399/400. See fuller particulars under " Kknt " Earldom, cr. 1360, under the 3d Karl. Earldom. 10, Slit Thomas Fitzala.v, K.B., 2.1 lint only purv, *, X 1100 Kichard (Friz alas), Earl of Arunl-el and Eaki. of ' SOHRKT la.-t abovenamed, was 4. 13 Oct. 1381, and was restored in . , - blood and honours, Oct 1400 (his lather's attainder bring reversed) 1410. becoming thereby KARL OF ARUNDEL and EAKI, OF SURREY, and taking his seat tho' still a minor ; K.G., 1400. He d. s.p. 13 Oct. 1415, on liis birthday, aged (exactly) 34, when the Earldom of Arundel devolved (with the Castle thereof) cm his coin-in and heir male, but the Earldom of Surrey reverted to tlin Crown, the estates and representation of the great family of De Warenne, formerly Earls of Surrey, devolving on his three sisters and coheirs. See fuller particulars under " Arisdkl" Earldom, su6 the XVllth holder of that dignity. XI. 1451, 1. John Mowbray, only & and h. ap. of Jolm (Mowbray), to Dlkk OF Norfolk, who was grandson and h. of John (MoWBRAT), DuKI 147G. of Norfolk (so cr. 1397), by Elizabeth, sister and coheir of Thomas (Fitzalan), Eahl of Arundel and Earl of Si'riiky abovenamed, was 6. 18 Oct. 1444, and was cr. v. p. 24 March 1451, EARL OF SUHKKV ANH VARENNE.(») By the death of his father, 6 Nov. 1401, he became DUKE OK NORFOLK, ic. He </. s.p.m. 17 Jan. 1475/6, aged 31, when the Dukedom ot .Vcr/bfir, the Larldnm of XaUingham, and the Earldom of Surrey and Warenne, became extinct, See fuller particulars uuder " Norfolk " Dukedom, cr. 1397 ; ex. 1476, sub the ;"»th Duke. XII. 1478, 1. Richard (I'lantagbnet), Duke of York, 2d b. of to Edward IV., h. 17 Aug. 1472 or 1473, and cr. DUKE OF YORK, 14i>3. 28 May 1474, having m., 15 Jan. 1477/8, Anne, only da. and h. of John (Mowbray), Duke of Norfolk, Earl of Nottingham, Earl of Surrey AND Wake.vnk, Arc, was cr. a few clays later, 7 Feb. 1 177/S, EARL WARENNE [presunjably(l>) tantamount to EAHL OF SURREY] and DUKE OF NORFOLK, having previously been cr. 12 June 1476, EARL OF NOTTINGHAM. Moth he and his wife d. in childhood, she, 16 Jan. 1480/1, and he 22 June 1483, in his 11th year (being murdered with his br., Edward V.) when ail his honours became extinct. See fuller particulars under "York" Dukedom, cr. 1474 ; ex. 1483. (") This style seems redundant and probably means " Earl of Surrey or Earl Warenne." See p. 329, note " c." ( b ) " Brooke considers (in which he is not contradicted by his severe Commentator, Vincent) that Richard Plantagenet was cr. Earl of Surrey, which title is likewise attributed to him by most other writers. Dugdale and Vincent, however, cite his patents of creation to the Earldoms of Nottingham and Warren, and to the Dukedom of Norfolk, but take no notice of any patent creating him Earl of Surrey, tho' £20 a year was assigned him out of the Counties of Surrey and Sussex to support his other dignities. No such patent is to be found on the patent Rolls." [Mcolas, slightly enlarged by Courthnpe]. The name of the dignity thus cited is " Comes Warcnncc."