Revels company was migrating from the Blackfriars to the Whitefriars. The agent was Philip Rosseter who, with Robert Keysar, was financially interested in the Revels company. When the King's men began to occupy the Blackfriars in the autumn of 1609, they took on responsibility for half the dead rent, but whether the arrangement survived the lawsuit of 1610 is unknown.
ii. THE CHILDREN OF THE CHAPEL AND OF THE QUEEN'S
REVELS
The Children of the Chapel (1501-1603).
Masters of the Children: William Newark (1493-1509), William Cornish (1509-23), William Crane (1523-45), Richard Bower (1545-61), Richard Edwardes (1561-6), William Hunnis (1566-97), Richard Farrant (acting, 1577-80), Nathaniel Giles (1597-1634).
The Children of the Queen's Revels (1603-5).
The Children of the Revels (1605-6).
Masters: Henry Evans, Edward Kirkham, and others.
The Children of the Blackfriars (1606-9).
The Children of the Whitefriars (1609-10).
Masters: Robert Keysar and others.
The Children of the Queen's Revels (1610-16).
Masters: Philip Rosseter and others.
[Bibliographical Note.—Official records of the Chapel are to be found in E. F. Rimbault, The Old Cheque Book of the Chapel Royal (1872, Camden Soc.). Most of the material for the sixteenth-century part of the present section was collected before the publication of C. W. Wallace, The Evolution of the English Drama up to Shakespeare (1912, cited as Wallace, i), which has, however, been valuable for purposes of revision. J. M. Manly, The Children of the Chapel Royal and their Masters (1910, C. H. vi. 279), W. H. Flood, Queen Mary's Chapel Royal (E. H. R. xxxiii. 83), H. M. Hildebrand, The Early History of the Chapel Royal (1920, M.P. xviii. 233), are useful contributions. The chief published sources for the seventeenth century are three lawsuits discovered by J. Greenstreet and printed in full by F. G. Fleay, A Chronicle History of the London Stage (1890), 127, 210, 223. These are (a) Clifton v. Robinson and Others (Star Chamber, 1601), (b) Evans v. Kirkham (Chancery, May-June 1612), cited as E. v. K., with Fleay's pages, and (c) Kirkham v. Painton and Others (Chancery, July-Nov. 1612), cited as K. v. P. Not much beyond dubious hypothesis is added by C. W. Wallace, The Children of the Chapel at Blackfriars (1908, cited as Wallace, ii). But Professor Wallace published an additional suit of importance, (d) Keysar v. Burbadge and Others (Court of Requests, Feb.-June 1610), in Nebraska University Studies (1910), x. 336, cited as K. v. B. This is apparently one of twelve suits other than Greenstreet's, which he claims (ii. 36) to have found, with other material, which may alter the story. In the meantime, I see no reason to depart from the main outlines sketched in my article on Court Performances under James the First (1909, M. L. R. iv. 153).]
