Mr. Cox wanted the clause excepting the Indians from the operations of the bill stricken out, and stated that the Secretary of the Interior had already said to the House that the civilization of the Indian was impossible while the buffalo remained on the plains.
The Clerk read for Mr. McCormick the following extract from the New Mexican, a paper published in Santa Fé:
Mr. McCormick considered the subject important, and had not a doubt of the fearful slaughter. He read the following extract from a letter that he had received from General Hazen:
He agreed with Mr. Cox that some features of the bill would probably be impracticable, and moved to amend it. He did not believe any bill would entirely accomplish the purpose, but he desired that such wanton slaughter should be stopped.
Said be, “It would bare been well both for the Indians and the white men if an enactment of this kind had been placed on our statute-books years ago.*** I know of no one act that would gratify the red men more."
Mr. Holman expressed surprise that Mr. Cox sbould make any objection to parts of the measure. The former regarded the bill as “an effort in a most commendable direction," and trusted that it would pass.
Mr. Cox said he would not hare objected to the bill but from the fact that it was partial in its provisions. He wanted a bill that would im. pose a penalty on every man, red, white, or black, who may wantonly kill these buffaloes.
Mr. Potter desired to know whether more buffaloes were slaughtered by the Indians than by white men.
Mr. Fort thought the white men were doing the greatest amount of killing.
Mr. Eldridge thought there would be just as much propriety in kill. ing the fish in our rivers as in destroying the buffalo in order to compel the Indians to become civilized.
Mr. Conger said: "As a matter of fact, every man knows the range of