a preface as Mr. Tapping's, it is difficult to imagine. On opening it, my eye falls at once on a false statement, which ought to destroy the authority of all the rest. Mr. Tapping writes (p. vi.) that "the manufacturers have instituted the 'National Association of Factory Occupiers,' the special purpose of which, it is said, is to raise a fund for defraying thereout all fines for not fencing which may be inflicted upon members. For the sake of suffering humanity it is hoped that, notwithstanding such illegal association, the inspectors will vigorously prosecute all violations of the law in this respect." This statement is dated October 2nd, 1855; whereas the Special Report of your Association, dated July, expressly declares that the Association will pay no penalties awarded under Factory Acts. Mr. Tapping tells us "it is said;" but he is not justifiable in publishing such a statement, and thereupon declaring your Association "illegal," without fully ascertaining the fact.
If the publication of my MS. should induce any considerable number of persons to inquire into the facts of the case, and investigate the principle of such special legislation as that which has singled out one class for stringent restraint, and may impose similar restraint on every other class in turn, I shall be glad that I have offered to you this spontaneous plea on behalf of your cause. I trust it can do that cause no harm, if it does no good.
I suppose, and hope, that you will print the paper just as
