our position, our fabric, and our library; as well as for other purposes that aim at the promotion of research, the advancement of science, and the substantial recognition of those who by their labours and discoveries are worthy of being thus honoured. He emphasised the fact that, as contrasted with provincial cities, "the vital interests of higher learning make little appeal to the sentiments or generosity of wealthy peers or commoners, whose interests lie largely in London." He further pointed out "that this Royal, but unendowed, College is constantly appealed to for advice by the several offices of the State, which thus receive gratuitous assistance for the benefit of the public." I think things have improved somewhat since Sir Dyce Duckworth's appeal was made, but it is still necessary to bring into prominence what he then said, namely, "that a corporation such as this well commends itself to the consideration and substantial liberality of persons of wealth and patriotic intelligence resident in London." Therefore, may I suggest that the College is always ready to receive, and to make good use of, any gifts from those who are too richly endowed with this world's goods, and are desirous of getting rid of their superfluous wealth? Some whom I am now addressing may be thus fortunately situated, or they may be on intimate terms with and able to influence a Carnegie, a Donald Currie, or a South African millionaire, in such a way as to make them
