Page:The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis II 1921 1.djvu/141

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

BOOK REVIEWS 133

Much of the book is devoted to the description of cases; these appear to be well chosen and admirably adapted to illustrate the author's views.

A description of the important mechanism of transference is omitted; it is however possible to read between the lines and see that Dr. Culpin recognises that his successful treatment depended on this mechanism. Dr. Culpin, while not accepting the Freudian conception of origins, admits the therapeutic value of this technique.

R. IM. RlGGALL.


Psychology AND Psychotherapy. By William Brown, M.A., M.D., D.Sc. With a Foreword by William Aldren Turner, C.B.,M.D. (Arnold, London, 1921. Pp. 196. Price 8s. 6d.)

Dr. Brown has given us a very readable Httle volume, and what he has to say is attractively and clearly presented. It would be good if more of the books written on cognate topics were written with the same conciseness, neatness and clarity.

The contents of the book, however, are of more unequal value, though the author has, with one important exception, successfully achieved his main purpose of expounding the psychological principles underlying the practice of psychotherapy. Of the five sections the first, "Introductory", gives a general account of mental dissociation, hypnot- ism, and of hysteria and other neuroses, with a thumb-nail sketch of Freud's and Jung's views of sex. The description of neurasthenia (p. 34) makes it plain that the author really has the condition of hypochondria in mind. He says that Freud's three objections to the method of hypnot- ism are: (1) Failure of the method in certain cases. (2) Its tendency to produce other symptoms in place of those of which the patient is cured. (3) Fear of the transference of sexual feeling to the person of the physician (p. 16). The last of these is, of course, a grotesque invention. In the second he ascribes to Freud the belief that hypnotism produces the other symptoms, whereas Freud naturally is speaking of the neurosis. Freud's real objection is not included m the list, though it is hinted at elsewhere in the book in a misleading statement One notes, by the way, that, whenever the subject of trans- ference and its relation to suggestion is touched on, signs of con- fusion of thought appear. Thus the author proclaims with the air of discovery, and insists in the face of imaginary opposition, that trans- ference occurs during psycho-analysis ! "I am not claiming that analysis involves suggestion . . . But I am contending that the method of psycho- analysis, even when carried out according to the strictest rules of the Freudian school, does involve suggestion in the form of transference.