race; that the perils of the journey are greater than those occasioned by more sedentary habits. It has even been suggested that migration is a, habit specially created to thin down the surplus bird population. Dr W. K. Brooks, however, puts this idea, which is not entirely devoid of truths, in rather a different way "Adaptations of nature are primarily for the good of the species—beneficial to individuals only so far as these individuals are essential to the welfare of the species" (9). The destruction of overabundant young, the thinning down of superfluous numbers, may be an economic advantage. It is one thing to say that migration has been caused to kill off a surplus, and another to show that, once a habit has been originated and become, an advantage, it will be conducive to a greater prolificness, and that the natural sequence of an increased birthrate, when food supply and other conditions remain unchanged, must be an increased mortality. Thus the perils of migration may become a boon to the species.
The theories of C. L. Brehm (7) and Marek that birds are living barometers, foretelling by intuition the changes of barometric pressure, may be dismissed as purely speculative. That birds begin their journeys during particular barometric conditions is certain, but what they know of forthcoming weather conditions is guess~work.
