Page:The Newspaper and the Historian.djvu/322

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
260
THE NEWSPAPER AND THE HISTORIAN

send it a few official communications sent out from State Departments, but "neither of these privileges is worth much;" that the number of tickets to the reporters' gallery at Westminster is limited; and that in general the Government can make little return to newspapers that support it.[1] But since Government has often been averse to conferring such favors, even when it has had the opportunity, the explanation is scarcely satisfactory. Canning indicated to William Jerdan under date of June, 1826, that he was most unwilling to make any appointments where the connection of the recipients with the press would make them objectionable.[2] The adoption of the policy of rewarding editors by gift of office that was adopted by Andrew Jackson and long continued by his successors never commended itself to any except to the often unworthy recipients.

Somewhat similar disaffection and complaint of lack of appreciation by government has been found in Germany where the newspapers have been called "poor international newsgatherers" and this has been in part explained by the personnel of the Ger man newspaper office . It can seldom command men of the ability that represent the great London papers in foreign capitals, be cause of the inferior standing of journalists in Germany in comparison with those in Western Europe. Very few select journalism as an occupation because the social prestige belonging to the profession and professional pride among journalists are as undeveloped as when Freytag wrote Die Journalisten.[3] Why this has been so has sometimes been understood by the Germans themselves. Many years ago a writer on the operation of bureaucracy noted the great number of decorations distributed in time of war and acquiesces in it, but he can not refrain from adding,

" But why, in time of peace, military exercise, good drill, good generalship, and the like, should count for more than solid judicialwork, and the like, is not so easy to see."[4]

Whether Bismarck's attitude towards the press was cause or result is both uncertain and immaterial, but Bismarck himself


  1. E. Porritt, The Englishman at Home, pp. 320-321.
  2. W. Jerdan, Autobiography, IV, 160-164.
  3. R. H. Fife, Jr., The German Empire between Two Wars, p. 364.
  4. Friedrich von Schulte, "Bureaucracy and its Operation in Germany and Austria-Hungary," Contemporary Review, March, 1880, 37: 432-458.