Page:The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 Volume 2.djvu/567

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
records of the federal convention
561

Monday
MADISON
September 10

reform. These Republican propositions had however, much to his regret been widely, and in his opinion, irreconcileably departed from— In this state of things it was his idea and he accordingly meant to propose, that the State Conventions shd. be at liberty to offer amendments to the plan,—and that these should be submitted to a second General Convention, with full power to settle the Constitution finally— He did not expect to succeed in this proposition, but the discharge of his duty in making the attempt, would give quiet to his own mind.

Mr. Wilson was against a reconsideration for any of the purposes which had been mentioned.

Mr King thought it would be more respectful to Congress to submit the plan generally to them; than in such a form as expressly and necessarily to require their approbation or disapprobation. The assent of nine States he considered as sufficient; and that it was more proper to make this a part of the Constitution itself, than to provide for it by a supplemental or distinct recommendation.

Mr. Gerry urged the indecency and pernicious tendency of dissolving in so slight a manner, the solemn obligations of the articles of confederation. If nine out of thirteen can dissolve the compact, Six out of nine will be just as able to dissolve the new one hereafter.

Mr. Sherman was in favor of Mr. King's idea of submitting the plan generally to Congress. He thought nine States ought to be made sufficient: but that it would be best to make it a separate act and in some such form as that intimated by Col: Hamilton, than to make it a particular article of the Constitution.

On the question for reconsidering the two articles. XXI & XXII—

N.H. divd. Mas. no Ct. ay. N.J. ay. Pa. no Del. ay. Md. ay— Va. ay. N.C. ay. S.C. no. Geo. ay. [Ayes—7; noes—3; divided—1.][1]

  1. The votes of Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina were changed from "ay" to "no". In the case of South Carolina this may have been a later revision, in the case of the other two, probably not.